Threes! vs UNO!™

How do Threes! and UNO!™ compare on difficulty, ad pressure, in-app-purchase pressure and what real reviewers say? A side-by-side look, grounded in App Store data.

 Threes! iconThrees!UNO!™ iconUNO!™
GenreCardCard
PricePaidFree
Difficultymediumvariable
Ad intensitynonehigh
In-app-purchase pressurenonehigh
Typical sessionvariableshort
Rating4.0 / 54.7 / 5
Ratings count2,997649,395
Reviews say
What players like
  • Addictive, easy-to-learn puzzle mechanics
  • Buy-once with no IAP or ads
  • Long-lasting appeal, players return for years
Common complaints
  • Recent soundtrack change alienated longtime fans
  • Game crashes after updates, requires reinstall
  • Swipe detection broken, misreads inputs
What players like
  • Classic UNO gameplay available
  • Multiple modes including 2v2 team play
  • Active tournaments and leaderboards
Common complaints
  • Excessive pop-ups blocking gameplay (10-17 reported per session)
  • Perceived rigging/algorithm designed to force spending
  • Unbalanced coin rewards (300 for wins, 1000+ for losses)

Threes! — A meditative number-sliding puzzle that rewards strategic thinking with elegant simplicity and hypnotic gameplay. (rated medium difficulty, none ad pressure) UNO!™ — Digital UNO with tournaments and friend modes, but laden with ads and aggressive monetization. (rated variable difficulty, high ad pressure)

Still deciding? Ask the finder — grounded in real reviews:

Data: Apple App Store, as of 2026-08-24. Last updated 2026-08-24.